The code could stil do with some cleaning up, and better optimisation for memory usage; but all tests are passing... that's for full multi-level sorting (including direction), and allowing for correct sorting of sting/numeric datatypes.
* Eliminate Most Scrutinizer Problems in Test Suite
Mostly minor code changes, with some annotations.
* Missed 2 php-cs-fixer Problems
They should be fixed now.
These changes have already been implemented twice, and been regressed twice. I'll try once more (with a different approach), then give up ...
As configured, Phpstan running under Php7 reports no errors. However, running under Php8, it reports 100 (!) errors. The vast majority of these are due to two reasons:
- renaming parameters in Php builtin functions in preparation for named parameters.
- using the new class GdImage rather than type resource as the argument type for many image-based functions.
Regardless of the cause, this will be a problem sooner or later. This PR is an attempt to get ahead of that problem. For source members, it mostly adds annotations or updates doc-blocks. Only 2 members have changes to executable code, and these are very minor - BitWise and Writer/Xlsx. For test members, all baseline errors are deleted and the code is fixed. Php7 and Php8 both report no errors with this configuration.
The new array tests for IMCSC fail on my system because of a rounding error in the 14th (!) decimal position. This is not a real failure. Change the test to use only the first 8 decimal positions.
* Capture of worksheet name in Calculation Engine cell references modified to handle apostrophe and quote marks, and made non-greedy to avoid ensure that multiple quoted worksheet names in a formula aren't all captured in one go
* Split some of the unit tests into separate test classes
* Initial work on implementing Array-enabled for the HLOOKUP() and VLOOKUP() functions
* In the MATCH() function, we should also use `evaluateArrayArgumentsIgnore()` because the lookupvalue and matchType arguments can be array arguments, but lookupArray is always a dataset matrix
Implement Array-enabled for ERROR.TYPE() function
Extract ERROR.TYPE() function tests into separate test file
Extract error function tests into separate test files
And thus complete the implemented Information functions
* First steps toward array-enabling the information functions
Also includes moving unit tests out from Functions and into a separate, dedicated Information folder
* Resolve issue with IF(), branch pruning and calculation cache (ensure that we don't convert the if condition to a bool before we've tested to see if it evaluates to an error)
More refactoring
Fix#2523. This isn't actually a fix; the problem was reported and confirmed for 1.21, but had already been fixed in master (and remains fixed in 1.22). This PR just adds a unit test for the original problem.
* Start work on array-enabling the Lookup and Reference functions
Requires a new method (`evaluateArrayArgumentsSubsetFrom()`) in the `ArrayEnabled` Trait to handle functions where the arguments that need special array handling are trailing rather than leading arguments
* Start work on array-enabling the Lookup and Reference functions
Requires a new method (`evaluateArrayArgumentsSubsetFrom()`) in the `ArrayEnabled` Trait to handle functions where the arguments that need special array handling are trailing rather than leading arguments
* Split Information functions into a dedicated class and namespace and categorise as Value or Error
* Refactor all error functions into the new ExcelError class
* Enable array-readiness for more Math/Trig functions; CEILING() FLOOR() (and variants), TRUNC(), BASE() and the various Logarithms
* Minor refactoring
Provide a separate "subset" method in the `ArrayEnabled` Trait, that allows a subset of arguments to be tested for array returns.
Set up basic tests for `WORKDAY()`
* Initial work enabling Excel function implementations for handling arrays as aguments when used in "array formulae".
So far:
- handling for single argument functions
- for functions where only one of the arguments is an array (a matrix or a row/column vector)
- for when there are two array arguments, and one is a row vector, the other a column vector
- for when there are either 2 row vectors, or 2 column vectors
- for a matrix and either a row or column vector
Will work ok, as long as there are no more than two array arguments; still need to identify the logic to apply when there are more than two arrays; or there are two that aren't an already supported row vector/column vector pairing (ie two matrices).
* Throw an exception if we have three or more array arguments (after flattening) passed to a supported function until we can identify the abstruse non-euclidian logic behind how Excel handles building, using and presenting those n-dimensional result arrays
* Implement array arguments for the DATE() function so that we can verify that paired arrays/vectors work with functions that support more than 2 arguments
* Implement array arguments for the many of the Math/Trig functions
* Update change log
* Implementation of the SEQUENCE() Excel365 function
Note that the Calculation Engine does not yet support the Spill operator, or spilling functions
* Handle the use-case of step = 0; and tests for exception handling for invalid arguments
* Update Change Log
* Xlsx Reader Merge Range For Entire Column(s) or Row(s)
Fix#2501. Merge range can be supplied as entire rows or columns, e.g. `1:1` or `A:C`. PhpSpreadsheet is expecting a row and a column to be specified for both parts of the range, and fails when the unexpected format shows up.
The code to clear cells within the merge range is very inefficient in terms of both memory and time, especially when the range is large (e.g. for an entire row or column). More efficient code is substituted. It is possible that we can get even more efficient by deleting the cleared cells rather than setting them to null. However, that needs more research, and there is no reason to delay this fix while I am researching.
When Xlsx Writer encounters a null cell, it writes it to the output file. For cell merges (especially involving whole rows or columns), this results in a lot of useless output. It is changed to skip the output of null cells when (a) the cell style matches its row's style, or (b) the row style is not specified and the cell style matches its column's style.
* Scrutinizer
See if these changes appease it.
* Improved CellIterators
Finally figured out how to improve efficiency here, meaning that there is no longer a reason to change Writer/Xlsx, so restore that.
* No Change for CellIterator
I had thought a change was needed for CellIterator, but it isn't.
* Refinement for XIRR
Fix#2469. The algorithm used for XIRR is known not to converge in some cases, some of which are because the value is legitimately unsolvable; for others, using a different guess might help.
The algorithm uses continual guesses at a rate to hopefully converge on the solution. The code in Python package xirr (https://github.com/tarioch/xirr/) suggests a refinement when this rate falls below -1. Adopting this refinement solves the problem for the data in issue 2469 without any adverse effect on the existing tests. My thanks to @tarioch for that refinement.
The data from 2469 is, of course, added to the test cases. The user also mentions that an initial guess equal to the actual result doesn't converge either. A test is also added to confirm that that case now works.
The test cases are changed to run in the context of a spreadsheet rather than by direct calls to XIRR calculation routine. This revealed some data validation errors which are also cleaned up with this PR. This suggests that other financial tests might benefit from the same change; I will look into that.
* More Unit Tests
From https://github.com/RayDeCampo/java-xirr/blob/master/src/test/java/org/decampo/xirr/XirrTest.javahttps://github.com/tarioch/xirr/blob/master/tests/test_math.py
Note that there are some cases where the PHP tests do not converge, but the non-PHP tests do. I have confirmed in each of those cases that Excel does not converge, so the PhpSpreadsheet results are good, at least for now. The discrepancies are noted in comments in the test member.
* New Error Reported with Phpstan 1.3
Dependabot opened a number of PRs. Most are successful, but this change is necessary to allow PR #2477 to complete successfully, and that is apparently a necessity for PR #2479.
Phpstan 1.3 objected to:
```php
trigger_error($errorMessage, E_USER_ERROR);
return false;
```
It claims the return statement is unreachable. This isn't precisely true - an error handler might allow the return to be reached. At any rate, I have slightly restructured the code so that Phpstan will not object either with 1.2 or 1.3, which should allow the blocked PRs to succeed. There had been no previous tests for what happens when there is a formula error when suppressFormulaErrors is true.
* Scrutinizer
Didn't like effect of changes which Phpstan liked. Hopefully this will work better.
* Improvement
Eliminate added function.
Replace mock tests with real ones when possible. The original tests are all still present; they just take place in a more representative scenario.
After this, there will be 4 remaining uses of mocking. Of these, 3 are needed for scenarios which are otherwise hard to test - WebServiceTest, CellsTest, and SampleCoverageTest. For the other one, AutoFilterTest, I just can't figure out what it's trying to accomplish, so have left it alone.
This change is almost entirely restricted to tests. There is a one-line change in src. When the first argument passed to OFFSET is null or nullstring, the returned value is currently 0. However, according to the documentation for Excel, it should be `#VALUE!`. The code is changed accordingly.
See issue #2123. HLOOKUP needs to do some conversions between column numbers and letters which it had not been doing.
HLOOKUP tests were performed using direct calls to the function in question rather than in the context of a spreadsheet. This contributed to keeping this error obscured even though there were, in theory, sufficient test cases. The tests are changed to perform in spreadsheet context. For the most part, the test cases are unchanged. One of the expected results was wrong; it has been changed, and a new case added to cover the case it was supposed to be testing.
After getting the HLOOKUP tests in order, it turned out that a test using literal arrays which had been succeeding now failed. The array constructed by the literals are considerably different than those constructed using spreadsheet cells; additional code was added to handle this situation.
My bulletproofing of these tests was not yet sufficient. Although I have never had a failure in probably thousands of tests, one user submitted a PR which did fail testing NOW, fortunately not in a test that is required to pass. The problem is that it is not sufficient merely to set the cell value inside a do-while loop; it is necessary to calculate it in order to cache its result so that results based on that cell will be internally consistent.
No source code is changed for this PR, just some tests.
MarkBaker
oleibman
oleibman